To receive reviewer feedback for preparing a camera-ready paper, you MUST strictly adhere to the following CEUR acceptance criteria:

The structure of the paper, as a rule, should include: Abstract; Keywords; Introduction; Related Work; Proposed Methodology/Model/Approach; Results/Discussion; Conclusions; References.

The References section MUST NOT be excessively short or unnecessarily long; authors ARE REQUIRED to utilize international research findings. Authors MUST NOT rely solely on a narrow circle of references from their own institution or a limited number of organizations. Generally, self-citation MUST NOT exceed 20%. References should, preferably, be contemporary—NO OLDER than 5–8 years. A single cascade (group) citation must consist of no more than 3 sources.

The English language MUST be thoroughly proofread.

The paper MUST strictly follow the CEUR-WS.org formatting guidelines. Please pay special attention to the FONT SIZE AND STYLE used for the paper title, section/subsection headings, and figure and table captions. Please carefully verify the reference list formatting style.

All references must be presented in English. In cases of extreme necessity, references in other languages may be included with appropriate annotations, such as (in Ukrainian) or (in Polish), etc.

The quality of all figures must be very high to ensure proper reproduction in the CEUR publication. All illustrative figures must be provided with captions. All abbreviations must be defined upon first mention. The size of letters and numbers in formulas and formula fragments within the text must be consistent.

The title of the paper should not be excessively long (up to 13 words, including articles and prepositions such as THE, IN, FOR, etc.) and must accurately reflect the research results discussed in the paper. Please avoid using the same words twice in the paper title.

The number of authors must not exceed 5 co-authors.

Authors are required to make moderate revisions to their manuscript as recommended in the peer reviews. THE MANUSCRIPT BECOMES ACCEPTABLE FOR PUBLICATION ONLY IF THESE REVISION RECOMMENDATIONS ARE SUCCESSFULLY ADDRESSED AND IMPLEMENTED.

REGARDING THE POTENTIAL USE OF GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (GenAI) TOOLS:
Dear authors, please strictly adhere to the official requirements: https://ceur-ws.org/GenAI/Policy.html.
In accordance with the CEUR-WS Policy, any use of GenAI tools for drafting, paraphrasing, or grammar checking must be explicitly disclosed in a dedicated “Declaration on Generative AI” section within your manuscript. AI tools cannot be listed as co-authors.

Dear colleagues, we kindly remind you of the necessity to strictly comply with the formatting requirements established by our publisher, CEUR. Papers formatted WITHOUT ADHERING TO THESE REQUIREMENTS WILL BE REJECTED AT THE INITIAL SCREENING STAGE (DESK REJECT).

Submitted papers will be peer-reviewed by two scholars based on technical quality, relevance, originality, significance, and clarity. If necessary, a third, additional reviewer will be involved. The International Program Committee will use these reviews to determine which papers will be accepted for presentation at the workshop. The review results will be communicated to the submitting authors via email, along with the reviewers’ comments, if any.

Accepted papers presented at the workshop are to be submitted to CEUR-WS.org for online publication.